| |
| Presentation Skills |
| 1. |
Ability to communicate: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
21 |
50.0% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
17 |
40.5% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
4 |
9.5% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 42 |
| Average: 4.40 (Range: 3.10 to 5.00) |
|
| 2. |
Use of visual aids: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
24 |
57.1% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
14 |
33.3% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
3 |
7.1% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
1 |
2.4% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 42 |
| Average: 4.45 (Range: 3.45 to 5.00) |
|
| 3. |
Readability of visual aids: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
19 |
45.2% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
17 |
40.5% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
4 |
9.5% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
2 |
4.8% |
|
| 1 (high) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 42 |
| Average: 4.26 (Range: 3.60 to 5.00) |
|
| 4. |
Organization of material: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
20 |
47.6% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
20 |
47.6% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
2 |
4.8% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 42 |
| Average: 4.43 (Range: 3.36 to 5.00) |
|
| 5. |
Attentiveness to questions and comments: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
23 |
59.0% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
14 |
35.9% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
2 |
5.1% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 39 |
| Average: 4.54 (Range: 3.50 to 5.00) |
|
| |
| Content |
| 1. |
Knowledge of material: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
23 |
56.1% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
16 |
39.0% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
2 |
4.9% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 41 |
| Average: 4.51 (Range: 3.27 to 5.00) |
|
| 2. |
Newness of material: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
21 |
52.5% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
14 |
35.0% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
5 |
12.5% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 40 |
| Average: 4.40 (Range: 3.38 to 5.00) |
|
| 3. |
Technical relevance of material: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
18 |
43.9% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
17 |
41.5% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
5 |
12.2% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
1 |
2.4% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 41 |
| Average: 4.27 (Range: 2.44 to 5.00) |
|
| 4. |
Information has value for my work: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
14 |
34.1% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
11 |
26.8% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
14 |
34.1% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
1 |
2.4% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
1 |
2.4% |
|
| Responses: 41 |
| Average: 3.88 (Range: 3.00 to 5.00) |
|
| 5. |
Content matched written description: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
19 |
46.3% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
18 |
43.9% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
4 |
9.8% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 41 |
| Average: 4.37 (Range: 3.18 to 5.00) |
|
| 6. |
Information was technical in nature, not a 'sales pitch': |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
30 |
71.4% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
12 |
28.6% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 42 |
| Average: 4.71 (Range: 2.00 to 5.00) |
|
| |
| Technical Level |
|
Technical Level of Presentation: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| Too Much |
3 |
4 |
9.5% |
|
| Appropriate |
2 |
35 |
83.3% |
|
| Too Little |
1 |
3 |
7.1% |
|
| Responses: 42 |
| Average: 2.02 (Range: 1.43 to 2.30) |
|
| |
| Comments |
|
What were the strengths of this presentation? |
| |
| Comments |
| 07/16/2009 13:17:16: Did a very good job. |
| 07/16/2009 13:18:16: A very creative us of APEX. Options I never thought of but can certainly use. |
| 07/16/2009 13:20:57: Excellent display of new approach! |
| 07/16/2009 13:21:24: Brilliant idea!! |
| 07/16/2009 13:23:51: I like how he showed it step by step. |
| 07/16/2009 13:24:34: Good info to know. |
| 07/16/2009 13:25:20: Very interesting! Really demonstrates the power of APEX. Excellent presentation skills as well. |
| 07/16/2009 13:28:35: Very good information on how APEX used. |
| 07/16/2009 13:29:44: May contained too much code. |
| 07/16/2009 13:32:48: Excellent presentation. |
| 07/16/2009 13:33:40: It is a unique approach. |
| 07/16/2009 13:36:06: Great! |
| 07/16/2009 13:36:45: It was good to see a non-IT person's experiences. |
| 07/16/2009 13:38:26: Interesting new material. |
|
|
What were the weaknesses of this presentation? |
| |
| Comments |
| 07/16/2009 13:18:16: Nervous presentation. |
| 07/16/2009 13:20:03: Can you make red text boldfaced so easier to see for vs somewhat red. Color blind men. |
| 07/16/2009 13:24:34: Need more time to go over more details. |
| 07/16/2009 13:28:35: None. |
| 07/16/2009 13:32:48: None. |
| 07/16/2009 13:38:26: A little clunky moving on demo. |
| 07/16/2009 13:39:51: Too much detail on the process. |
|
|
What recommendations do you have for improvement of this presentation? |
| |
| Comments |
| 07/16/2009 13:23:51: The survey context was not apparent until the end. Show us the goal before the steps. |
| 07/16/2009 13:28:35: None. |
|
| |
| Overall Session Rating |
|
Overall Session Rating: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
13 |
36.1% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
17 |
47.2% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
5 |
13.9% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
1 |
2.8% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 36 |
| Average: 4.17 (Range: 3.20 to 5.00) |
|
| |
