| |
| Presentation Skills |
| 1. |
Ability to communicate: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
12 |
44.4% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
13 |
48.1% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
1 |
3.7% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
1 |
3.7% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 4.33 |
|
| 2. |
Use of visual aids: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
12 |
44.4% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
11 |
40.7% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
4 |
14.8% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 4.30 |
|
| 3. |
Readability of visual aids: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
8 |
29.6% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
12 |
44.4% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
5 |
18.5% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
2 |
7.4% |
|
| 1 (high) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 3.96 |
|
| 4. |
Organization of material: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
13 |
48.1% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
10 |
37.0% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
3 |
11.1% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
1 |
3.7% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 4.30 |
|
| 5. |
Attentiveness to questions and comments: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
21 |
77.8% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
6 |
22.2% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 4.78 |
|
| |
| Content |
| 1. |
Knowledge of material: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
18 |
66.7% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
7 |
25.9% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
1 |
3.7% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
1 |
3.7% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 4.56 |
|
| 2. |
Newness of material: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
14 |
51.9% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
9 |
33.3% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
4 |
14.8% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 4.37 |
|
| 3. |
Technical relevance of material: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
16 |
61.5% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
7 |
26.9% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
3 |
11.5% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 26 |
| Average: 4.50 |
|
| 4. |
Information has value for my work: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
16 |
59.3% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
9 |
33.3% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
2 |
7.4% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 4.52 |
|
| 5. |
Content matched written description: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
16 |
59.3% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
8 |
29.6% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
2 |
7.4% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
1 |
3.7% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 4.44 |
|
| 6. |
Information was technical in nature, not a 'sales pitch': |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
24 |
88.9% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
2 |
7.4% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
1 |
3.7% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 27 |
| Average: 4.85 |
|
| |
| Technical Level |
|
Technical Level of Presentation: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| Too Much |
3 |
2 |
8.3% |
|
| Appropriate |
2 |
20 |
83.3% |
|
| Too Little |
1 |
2 |
8.3% |
|
| Responses: 24 |
| Average: 2.00 |
|
| |
| Comments |
|
What were the strengths of this presentation? |
| |
| Comments |
| 06/26/2007 12:06:05: excellent details and tips |
| 06/26/2007 12:06:42: He knew his material very well |
| 06/26/2007 12:07:25: Actual production application used to enhance slides |
| 06/26/2007 12:07:49: excellent! |
| 06/26/2007 12:08:16: good Apex case |
| 06/26/2007 12:11:52: great topic coverage |
| 06/26/2007 12:16:13: A lot of technical ideas |
| 06/26/2007 12:16:37: Good to see what's possible |
| 06/26/2007 12:17:27: Showed real world examples, work, etc. |
| 06/26/2007 12:18:04: Covers a lot of topics well in a small amount of time |
|
|
What were the weaknesses of this presentation? |
| |
| Comments |
| 06/26/2007 12:02:43: expected more |
| 06/26/2007 12:04:24: Code text too small, distinguish highlighted code areas by font, not color. Doesn't print well. |
| 06/26/2007 12:16:13: Powerpoints should have more content and explanation. |
| 06/26/2007 12:17:27: Talked low, bounced around, should upgrade from 2.0 to fix small issues |
| 06/26/2007 12:18:04: Charts hard to see |
|
|
What recommendations do you have for improvement of this presentation? |
| |
| Comments |
| 06/26/2007 12:06:05: Keep it up |
| 06/26/2007 12:08:16: make slides a little bigger |
| 06/26/2007 12:11:52: bigger font sizes on screen caps |
| 06/26/2007 12:16:13: More content and summarizing of key points. Too much just showing block of "the code I wrote". Needs more organization and content |
|
| |
| Overall Session Rating |
|
Overall Session Rating: |
| |
| Response |
Value |
Count |
% |
Comment |
| 5 (high) |
5 |
11 |
42.3% |
|
| 4 |
4 |
12 |
46.2% |
|
| 3 |
3 |
2 |
7.7% |
|
| 2 |
2 |
1 |
3.8% |
|
| 1 (low) |
1 |
0 |
0.0% |
|
| Responses: 26 |
| Average: 4.27 |
|
| |
